Summary: High Court quashed order of resumption of the plot – Allowing appeal, SC observed: ere was no document whatsoever produced by the said alleged tenant to show that it was the tenant of the original allottees – Manjit Kumar Gulati and Ors. When the original allottees themselves had failed to comply with the conditions of auction sale, and when the allotment itself made in favour of the said allottees was cancelled by the Statutory Authority after following the due process of law, i.e., by issuing show cause notice before cancellation of allotment, and when number of opportunities of hearing were given to the allottees to clear the outstanding dues, there was no question of serving any notice to the so called tenant, M/s. Mohit Medicos, especially when there was nothing on record to suggest that M/s. Mohit Medicos was the tenant of the original allottees – Manjit Kumar Gulati and Ors. The High Court had completely lost sight of the said factual aspects of the matter while allowing the writ petitions filed by the respondents – allottees and the so called tenant – M/s. Mohit Medicos.