Evidence Act

Naeem vs State Of Uttar Pradesh 2024 INSC 169 :: [2024] 3 S.C.R. 36- Evidence Act- Dying Declaration

Indian Evidence Act, 1873; Section 32- Dying Declaration – Dying declaration can be the sole basis of the conviction if it inspires the full confidence of the court. The Court is required to satisfy itself that the deceased was in a fit state of mind at the time of making the statement and that it …

Naeem vs State Of Uttar Pradesh 2024 INSC 169 :: [2024] 3 S.C.R. 36- Evidence Act- Dying Declaration Read More »

Naresh Kumar vs State Of Haryana 2024 INSC 149 :: [2024] 2 S.C.R. 830 – S 306 IPC – Abetment Of Suicide – S 113A Evidence Act- Presumption

Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 306 – Indian Evidence Act, 1872; Section 113A – The mere fact that the deceased committed suicide within a period of seven years of her marriage, the presumption under Section 113A of the Evidence Act would not automatically apply – Mere fact of suicide within seven years of marriage, one …

Naresh Kumar vs State Of Haryana 2024 INSC 149 :: [2024] 2 S.C.R. 830 – S 306 IPC – Abetment Of Suicide – S 113A Evidence Act- Presumption Read More »

Shailesh Kumar vs State Of UP 2024 INSC 143 :: [2024] 2 S.C.R. 776 – S 172 CrPC – Case Diary – Ss 145,161,165 Evidence Act

Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Section 172 – Indian Evidence Act, 1872; Section 145,161 – When a police officer uses case diary for refreshing his memory, an accused automatically gets a right to peruse that part of the prior statement as recorded in the police officer’s diary by taking recourse to Section 145 or Section …

Shailesh Kumar vs State Of UP 2024 INSC 143 :: [2024] 2 S.C.R. 776 – S 172 CrPC – Case Diary – Ss 145,161,165 Evidence Act Read More »

Willian Stephen vs State Of Tamil Nadu 2024 INSC 146 – S 364A IPC – S 65B Evidence Act

Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 364A – The first ingredient of Section 364A is that there should be a kidnapping or abduction of any person or a person should be kept in detention after such kidnapping or abduction. If the said act is coupled with a threat to cause death or hurt to such person, …

Willian Stephen vs State Of Tamil Nadu 2024 INSC 146 – S 364A IPC – S 65B Evidence Act Read More »

Tehsildar, Urban Improvement Trust vs Ganga Bai Menariya (D) 2024 INSC 121 :: [2024] 2 S.C.R. 650 – Civil Suit- S 90 Evidence Act

Indian Evidence Act, 1872; Section 90– If the document is more than 30 years old and is being produced from proper custody, a presumption is available to the effect that signatures and every other part of such document, which purports to be in the handwriting of any particular person, is in that person’s handwriting and …

Tehsildar, Urban Improvement Trust vs Ganga Bai Menariya (D) 2024 INSC 121 :: [2024] 2 S.C.R. 650 – Civil Suit- S 90 Evidence Act Read More »

Govt. of Goa vs Maria Julieta D’Souza (D) 2024 INSC 88 – S 3 Evidence Act – Standard Of Proof

Indian Evidence Act, 1872; Section 3- . While inquiring into whether a fact is proved, the sufficiency of evidence is to be seen in the context of standard of proof, which in civil cases is by preponderance of probability – There is a clear distinction between burden of proof and standard of proof. This distinction …

Govt. of Goa vs Maria Julieta D’Souza (D) 2024 INSC 88 – S 3 Evidence Act – Standard Of Proof Read More »

Ajitsinh Chehuji Rathod vs State Of Gujarat 2024 INSC 63 – S 118,138,139 NI Act – S 73 Evidence Act – Bankers’ Books Evidence Act – Specimen Signature – Cheque Bounce Case

Indian Evidence Act, 1872; Section 73 – Bankers’ Books Evidence Act, 1891 – Certified copy of a document issued by a Bank is itself admissible under the Bankers’ Books Evidence Act, 1891 without any formal proof thereof. Hence, in an appropriate case, the certified copy of the specimen signature maintained by the Bank can be …

Ajitsinh Chehuji Rathod vs State Of Gujarat 2024 INSC 63 – S 118,138,139 NI Act – S 73 Evidence Act – Bankers’ Books Evidence Act – Specimen Signature – Cheque Bounce Case Read More »

Raja Gounder vs M Sengodan 2024 INSC 47 :: [2024] 1 S.C.R. 413 – Partition – Ss 17,18 Evidence Act – Admissions

Indian Evidence Act, 1872; Section 17,18 – Admission is a conscious and deliberate act and not something that could be inferred. An admission could be a positive act of acknowledgement or confession. To constitute an admission, one of the requirements is a voluntary acknowledgement through a statement of the existence of certain facts during the …

Raja Gounder vs M Sengodan 2024 INSC 47 :: [2024] 1 S.C.R. 413 – Partition – Ss 17,18 Evidence Act – Admissions Read More »

Is Formal Accusation/Police Custody Required To Invoke Section 27 Evidence Act? Supreme Court Corrects Itself !

Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872, which explains how much of information received from accused may be proved, reads as follows: “Provided that, when any fact is deposed to as discovered inconsequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police-officer, so much of such information, …

Is Formal Accusation/Police Custody Required To Invoke Section 27 Evidence Act? Supreme Court Corrects Itself ! Read More »

Perumal Raja @ Perumal vs State 2024 INSC 13 – Ss 27 & 106 Evidence Act

Indian Evidence Act, 1872; Section 25-27 – As soon as an accused or suspected person comes into the hands of a police officer, he is no longer at liberty and is under a check, and is, therefore, in “custody” within the meaning of Sections 25 to 27 of the Evidence Act. It is for this …

Perumal Raja @ Perumal vs State 2024 INSC 13 – Ss 27 & 106 Evidence Act Read More »