Jaseela Shaji vs Union Of India 2024 INSC 683 – Article 22(5) Constitution – Detention

Constitution of India,1950; Article 22(5)- It is not necessary to furnish copies of each and every document to which a casual or passing reference may be made in the narration of facts and which are not relied upon by the Detaining Authority in making the order of detention. However, failure to furnish copies of such document/documents as is/are relied on by the Detaining Authority which would deprive the detenu to make an effective representation would certainly amount to violation of the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.(Para 25) [In this case, the court held that non-supply of the statements affected the right of the detenu to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India and as such, the detention is vitiated on the said ground (Para 44)]

Constitution of India,1950; Article 22(5)-The Prison Authorities should ensure that the representations by the detenu are sent to the Competent Authorities immediately after the receipt thereof. In the present era of technological development, the said representation can be sent through email within a day. It is further needless to reiterate that the Competent Authority should decide such representation with utmost expedition so that the valuable right guaranteed to the detenu under Article 22(5) of the Constitution is not denied. In the matters pertaining to personal liberty of the citizens, the Authorities are enjoined with a constitutional obligation to decide the representation with utmost expedition. Each day’s delay matters in such a case. (Para 70)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *