To Buy Our Third CaseCiter Weekly Digest [7 October 2023], Please Ping Us On Twitter Or Telegram
[Click On Icon Below]
-
“Cannot Direct To Stop Hearbeat”: Supreme Court Refuses Plea To Terminate 26+ Weeks Pregnancy [X vs Union of India 2023 INSC 919]
The Supreme Court said that it cannot direct the doctors to stop the heartbeat. CJI led bench gave following reasons for not allowing termination of pregnancy: ▶Having crossed the statutory limit of twenty-four weeks, the requirements in either of Section 3(2B) or Section 5 must be met; ▶There are no “substantial foetal abnormalities” diagnosed by…
-
Supreme Court Directs TANGEDCO To Appoint ‘Colour Blind’ Candidate As Asst. Electrical Engineer [Mohamed Ibrahim vs Chariman & Managing Director 2023 INSC 914 ]
Summary: TANGEDCO rejected candidature of Mohamed Ibrahim for the post of Asst. Electrical Engineer on the ground that he was colour blind. Madras HC refused to interfere with this decision. Now, allowing his appeal, the Supreme Court directed TANGEDCO to appoint him as Asst. Electrical Engineer.
-
Pankaj Bansal vs Vijay Madanlal : Conflict Of Judgments On Arrests By ED?
In Vijay Madanlal Choudhary and others vs. Union of India [2022] 6 S.C.R. 382, the Supreme Court (three judges bench) held that non-supply of the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) in a given case cannot be found fault with, as the ECIR may contain details of the material in the ED’s possession and revealing the…
-
Protected: South Eastern Coalfields Ltd vs State of Madhya Pradesh 2023 INSC 865
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
-
Sidha Neelkanth Paper Industries Private Limited vs Prudent ARC Limited | Supreme Court | Section 18 SARFAESI | Pre Deposit For Appeal Before DRAT
Sidha Neelkanth Paper Industries Private Limited vs Prudent ARC Limited | 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 11 | CA 8969 OF 2022 | 5 Jan 2023 | Justices M R Shah and B V Nagarathna
-
Sabarmati Gas Limited vs Shah Alloys Limited | Supreme Court | IBC | CIRP | Limitation Act | Condonation of Delay | Pre Existing Dispute
“In the absence of provisions for exclusion of such period in respect of an application under Section 9, IBC, despite the combined reading of Section 238A, IBC and the provisions under the Limitation Act what is legally available to such a party is to assign the same as a sufficient cause for condoning the delay…