Summary: In a suit filed for partition and separate possession claiming that the appellant/plaintiff was the son of respondent no. 1/defendant no. 1, born from his marriage with Padminibai, very heavy burden was on the appellant/plaintiff to prove this fact, when the factum of marriage was denied by the respondent no. 1/defendant no. 1, as he was married to Sheshbai (respondent no. 4/defendant no. 4). From the evidence led by the appellant/plaintiff, he had failed to discharge that burden. – Dismissal of Partition Suit upheld