Motor Vehicles Act 1988

Arvind Kumar Pandey vs Girish Pandey CA 2512 Of 2024 – Motor Accident Compensation Claims – Homemaker

Motor Accident Compensation – Homemaker -The role of a homemaker is as important as that of a family member whose income is tangible as a source of livelihood for the family. The activities performed by a home-maker, if counted one by one, there will hardly be any doubt that the contribution of a home-maker is …

Arvind Kumar Pandey vs Girish Pandey CA 2512 Of 2024 – Motor Accident Compensation Claims – Homemaker Read More »

Shanthi Nanaiah vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited CA 1779 of 2024 – Motor Accident Compensation Claim – Contributory Negligence –

Motor Accident Compensation Claims – Contributory Negligence – When the lorry was standing in the middle of the road on which it was not supposed to be stationed at midnight and the jeep in question came from behind hitting the same, resulting in the death of the deceased, we do not find that the driver …

Shanthi Nanaiah vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited CA 1779 of 2024 – Motor Accident Compensation Claim – Contributory Negligence – Read More »

S Rajaseekaran vs Union Of India 2024 INSC 37 – S 161 Motor Vehicles Act -Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor Accidents Scheme, 2022 –

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ; Section 161 – Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor Accidents Scheme, 2022 – An accident involving a motor vehicle can be considered as a hit and run accident, provided the identity of the vehicle that caused the accident cannot be ascertained despite reasonable efforts. Obviously, reasonable efforts must …

S Rajaseekaran vs Union Of India 2024 INSC 37 – S 161 Motor Vehicles Act -Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor Accidents Scheme, 2022 – Read More »