Practice and Procedure

XXX vs State CrA 562 Of 2024 – Protest Petition Captioned As “U/Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C.”

Practice and Procedure – A technicality like the caption of the application/petition could not be an impediment to consider the substance thereof. [ In this case, instead of filing protest petition,the appellant moved an application captioned as “under Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C.”- We fail to understand what prevented the Magistrate from treating that application purportedly …

XXX vs State CrA 562 Of 2024 – Protest Petition Captioned As “U/Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C.” Read More »

State vs Naresh Prasad Agarwal 2024 INSC 120 – Judge Retaining Case File After Demitting Office – Impropriety

Practice and Procedure – On 17th April, 2017, the Single Judge Of High Court pronounced only one line order declaring the operative part. The Judge demitted office on 26th May, 2017 and a detailed judgment was made available only on 23rd October, 2017, nearly 5 months after the Judge demitted the office- SC observed: even …

State vs Naresh Prasad Agarwal 2024 INSC 120 – Judge Retaining Case File After Demitting Office – Impropriety Read More »

Directorate of Enforcement vs Bablu Sonkar 2024 INSC 107 – Practice & Procedure – Roster

Practice and Procedure – Roster notified by the Chief Justice is not an empty formality. All Judges are bound by the same – No Bench can hear a case, unless as per the prevailing roster, the particular case is assigned to the Bench or that the case is specially assigned to the Bench by the …

Directorate of Enforcement vs Bablu Sonkar 2024 INSC 107 – Practice & Procedure – Roster Read More »

JN Puri vs State of Uttar Pradesh 2024 INSC 64 – Restoration Application

Summary: High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed an application for restoration of the writ petition holding that it was submitted with a delay of seven years -Allowing appeal, the SC observed: As a matter of fact, the application for restoration was filed within a period of one month-the appellant still claims to be in possession of …

JN Puri vs State of Uttar Pradesh 2024 INSC 64 – Restoration Application Read More »

Saumya Chaurasia vs Directorate of Enforcement 2023 INSC 1073 – S 45 PMLA – Bail

Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 ; Section 45 First Proviso -The use of the expression “may be” in the first proviso to Section 45 clearly indicates that the benefit of the said proviso to the category of persons mentioned therein may be extended at the discretion of the Court considering the facts and circumstances …

Saumya Chaurasia vs Directorate of Enforcement 2023 INSC 1073 – S 45 PMLA – Bail Read More »

Should Arbitrator Be Made A Party In Petitions Under S 34/37 Arbitration Act?

Before we come to this query, it is important to read the Supreme Court judgment in Jogendrasinhgji Vikaysinhji vs State Of Gujarat, (2015) 9 SCC 1 especially the following observations: Civil courts, which decide matters, are courts in the strictest sense of the term. Neither the court nor the Presiding Officer defends the order before the superior court it …

Should Arbitrator Be Made A Party In Petitions Under S 34/37 Arbitration Act? Read More »