Summary -Charge sheet alleged that the accused, with the object of cheating the Bank, granted the three facilities to a company – High Court allowed his discharge petition – Dismissing appeal, SC observed: perhaps the only material that creates suspicion is the speed with which the proposal of the Company was sanctioned. As far as the respondent is concerned, considering his position and the role ascribed to him in the grant of sanction to the loan proposal of the Company, mere suspicion against him is not enough to frame a charge against him- Only because the entire proposal was processed and cleared within a short span of time, no offence is made out against the respondent. Taking the material in the charge sheet as it is, complicity of the respondent is not made out.