Civil Procedure Code

Brij Narayan Shukla (D) vs Sudesh Kumar Alias Suresh Kumar (D) 2024 INSC 9 – S 100 CPC – Second Appeal- Adverse Possession

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – The High Court was hearing the Second Appeal under section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 19082 and it having reappreciated the findings to disturb findings of fact, committed an error. (Para 9.2) Adverse Possession – The suit of the year 1944 was for the arrears of rent and …

Brij Narayan Shukla (D) vs Sudesh Kumar Alias Suresh Kumar (D) 2024 INSC 9 – S 100 CPC – Second Appeal- Adverse Possession Read More »

Mohammed Abdul Wahid vs Nilofer 2023 INSC 1075 – CPC – Evidence Act – Parties vs Witnesses

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Provisions of the Code as also the Evidence Act do not differentiate between a party to the suit acting as a witness and a witness otherwise called by such a party to testify – the term witness does not exclude the party to the …

Mohammed Abdul Wahid vs Nilofer 2023 INSC 1075 – CPC – Evidence Act – Parties vs Witnesses Read More »

Koushik Mutually Aided Cooperative Housing Society vs Ameena Begum 2023 INSC 1065 – CPC – Ex-Parte Decree

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Section 115, Order IX Rule 13, Order XLIII Rule 1(d) – When an application is filed seeking condonation of delay for seeking setting aside an ex-parte decree and the same is dismissed and consequently, the petition is also dismissed, the appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) CPC is maintainable- When …

Koushik Mutually Aided Cooperative Housing Society vs Ameena Begum 2023 INSC 1065 – CPC – Ex-Parte Decree Read More »

Does Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC Principles Apply To Withdrawal Of Interlocutory Applications?

Rule 1 of Order XXIII provides that when a plaintiff once institutes a suit in a Court and thereby avails of a remedy given to him under law, he cannot be permitted to institute a fresh suit in respect of the same subject-matter again after abandoning the earlier suit or by withdrawing it without the …

Does Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC Principles Apply To Withdrawal Of Interlocutory Applications? Read More »

Temporary Injunction In Suit For Specific Performance

The Supreme Court in Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprise Ltd. vs. KS Infraspace LLP Ltd., (2020) 5 SCC 410 observed: The grant of relief in a suit for specific performance is itself a discretionary remedy. A plaintiff seeking temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance will therefore have to establish a strong prima­facie case on basis of …

Temporary Injunction In Suit For Specific Performance Read More »

O XXXVII R 3 – Conditional Grant Of Leave To Defend In Summary Suit (Principles)

In IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. v. Hubtown Ltd., (2017) 1 SCC 568, the Supreme Court laid down the following principles: (1) If the defendant satisfies the court that he has a substantial defence, that is, a defence that is likely to succeed, the plaintiff is not entitled to leave to sign judgment, and the defendant …

O XXXVII R 3 – Conditional Grant Of Leave To Defend In Summary Suit (Principles) Read More »

O VIII R 1 CPC – Written Statement Filed After 120 Days In Commercial Suits

Can a written statement filed after 120 days from the date of service of summons in a commercial suit can be taken on record? Order VIII Rule 1 CPC (as applicable to Commercial Suits) reads as follows: Written Statement. – The defendant shall, within thirty days from the date of service of summons on him, …

O VIII R 1 CPC – Written Statement Filed After 120 Days In Commercial Suits Read More »

O IX R 6 CPC – Does CPC Contemplate An Order Setting Defendant Ex Parte ?

When a defendant does not appear when the Suit is called on for hearing on receipt of summons, we can see Courts passing order setting defendant Ex Parte. Is such an order contemplated under CPC? In Sangram Singh vs Election Tribunal [AIR 1955 SC 425], the Supreme Court termed such a practice as ‘erroneous’. “The fact that …

O IX R 6 CPC – Does CPC Contemplate An Order Setting Defendant Ex Parte ? Read More »