The Supreme Court said that it cannot direct the doctors to stop the heartbeat. CJI led bench gave following reasons for not allowing termination of pregnancy: ▶Having crossed the statutory limit of twenty-four weeks, the requirements in either of Section 3(2B) or Section 5 must be met; ▶There are no “substantial foetal abnormalities” diagnosed by …
Summary: TANGEDCO rejected candidature of Mohamed Ibrahim for the post of Asst. Electrical Engineer on the ground that he was colour blind. Madras HC refused to interfere with this decision. Now, allowing his appeal, the Supreme Court directed TANGEDCO to appoint him as Asst. Electrical Engineer.
In Vijay Madanlal Choudhary and others vs. Union of India [2022] 6 S.C.R. 382, the Supreme Court (three judges bench) held that non-supply of the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) in a given case cannot be found fault with, as the ECIR may contain details of the material in the ED’s possession and revealing the …
Pankaj Bansal vs Vijay Madanlal : Conflict Of Judgments On Arrests By ED? Read More »
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Sidha Neelkanth Paper Industries Private Limited vs Prudent ARC Limited | 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 11 | CA 8969 OF 2022 | 5 Jan 2023 | Justices M R Shah and B V Nagarathna
“In the absence of provisions for exclusion of such period in respect of an application under Section 9, IBC, despite the combined reading of Section 238A, IBC and the provisions under the Limitation Act what is legally available to such a party is to assign the same as a sufficient cause for condoning the delay …
Indian Medicines Pharmaceuticals Corporation Ltd vs Kerala Ayurvedic Co Operative Society Ltd. Case details : CA 6693 of 2022 | 3 Jan 2023 (Click to Read Judgment) Coram: CJI DY Chandrachud and Justice Hima Kohli Judgment links: SCI, IndianKanoon Citation : 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 6
Equivalent Citation : 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 2 Judgment link : SCI , IndianKanoon