2024 INSC May

Prashant Singh vs Meena 2024 INSC 380 – U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953

U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953; Section 49 – Section 49 contemplates bar to the jurisdiction of the 5 Civil or Revenue Court for the grant of declaration or adjudication of rights of tenure holders in respect of land lying in an area for which consolidation proceedings have commenced. Section 49 of the 1953 Act …

Prashant Singh vs Meena 2024 INSC 380 – U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 Read More »

Abhimeet Sinha vs High Court of Judicature At Patna 2024 INSC 381- Judicial Service – Minimum Qualifying Marks In Viva Voce/ Interview

Judicial Service – Bihar Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1951 – Gujarat State Judicial Service Rules, 2005; Rule 8(3) – Rules stipulating minimum qualifying marks in the viva voce test as a part of the selection criteria for appointment to the District Judiciary – The Prescription of minimum qualifying marks for interview is permissible and this …

Abhimeet Sinha vs High Court of Judicature At Patna 2024 INSC 381- Judicial Service – Minimum Qualifying Marks In Viva Voce/ Interview Read More »

A (Mother of X) vs State Of Maharashtra 2024 INSC 371 – MTP Act- Termination Of Pregnancy

Constitution of India, 1950; Article 21 – The right to choose and reproductive freedom is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. Therefore, where the opinion of a minor pregnant person differs from the guardian, the court must regard the view of the pregnant person as an important factor while deciding the termination …

A (Mother of X) vs State Of Maharashtra 2024 INSC 371 – MTP Act- Termination Of Pregnancy Read More »

Dr Ranbeer Bose vs Anita Das 2024 INSC 379

Constitution of India, 1950; Article 226- Writ petition raising issues irregularity committed in the construction- The appropriate remedy is to approach the municipal authorities and if no proper response was forthcoming, then the civil Court was the appropriate forum for ventilating the grievances of the nature. (Para 9)

Smita Shrivastava vs State of Madhya Pradesh 2024 INSC 378

Summary: Illegal denial of appointment – Allowing appeal, SC observed:It is a glaring case wherein the adamant, arbitrary, mala fide and high-handed approach of the State Government and its officials has driven the appellant to a series of prolonged litigations which were evidently not out of her choice. The appellant deserves a direction for restitutive …

Smita Shrivastava vs State of Madhya Pradesh 2024 INSC 378 Read More »

Chander Bhan (D) vs Mukhtiar Singh 2024 INSC 377 – Lis Pendens – TP Act

Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Section 52- Doctrine of lis pendens- Object underlying the doctrine of lis pendens is for maintaining status quo that cannot be affected by an act of any party in a pending litigation. The objective is also to prevent multiple proceedings by parties in different forums. The principle is based on …

Chander Bhan (D) vs Mukhtiar Singh 2024 INSC 377 – Lis Pendens – TP Act Read More »

Alauddin vs State Of Assam 2024 INSC 376 – Ss 161,162 CrPC – Ss 145,155 Evidence Act

Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Section 161,162– Any statement made by a person to a police officer in the course of investigation, which is reduced in writing, cannot be used for any purpose except as provided in Section 162. The first exception incorporated in sub-Section (2) is of the statements covered by clause (1) of …

Alauddin vs State Of Assam 2024 INSC 376 – Ss 161,162 CrPC – Ss 145,155 Evidence Act Read More »

Kanihya @ Kanhi(D) vs Sukhi Ram 2024 INSC 374 – Civil Suit For Pre-Emption

Summary: Suit for pre-emption – Plaintiff was required to deposit a sum of ₹ 9,214/- minus 1/5th of the pre-emption amount already deposited, on or before 10.10.1988, failing which the suit shall stand dismissed- Plaintiff deposited amount – Later defendant filed an application seeking dismissal of the suit on account of non-compliance of the direction …

Kanihya @ Kanhi(D) vs Sukhi Ram 2024 INSC 374 – Civil Suit For Pre-Emption Read More »