Service Law

Manilal vs State Of Rajasthan 2024 INSC 675 – Service Law

Summary: Allowing appeal filed by a candidate to teacher post, SC held: We direct the respondent-authorities to treat the appointment given to the appellant, pursuant to the interim order of the Division Bench dated 23.10.2021, as a regular appointment and after reinstating the appellant grant consequential benefits. We direct that except for the period the …

Manilal vs State Of Rajasthan 2024 INSC 675 – Service Law Read More »

Anantdeep Singh vs High Court Of Punjab & Haryana 2024 INSC 673 – Service Law

Service Law – Miscellanious application, the applicant- appellant prayed that he should be reinstated into service as Civil Judge with all consequential benefits in view of the SC order dated 20.04.2024- SC held: Once the termination order is set aside and judgment of the High Court dismissing the writ petition challenging the said termination order …

Anantdeep Singh vs High Court Of Punjab & Haryana 2024 INSC 673 – Service Law Read More »

Kerala Agricultural University vs TP Murali @ Murali Thavara Panen 2024 INSC 658 – Kerala Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Kerala Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1960; Rule 15- A plain reading of Rule 15(2)(a) of the Kerala Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1960, which is applicable for imposing major penalties specifically lays down that the disciplinary authority or the appointing authority or any other authority, empowered by Government in this …

Kerala Agricultural University vs TP Murali @ Murali Thavara Panen 2024 INSC 658 – Kerala Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules Read More »

UP State Road Transport Corporation vs Brijesh Kumar 2024 INSC 638 – Compassionate Appointment – Contractual Appointment – Service Law

Compassionate Appointment– Any appointment made on compassionate basis is in the nature of a permanent appointment and is not liable to be treated as temporary or contractual- But The mere fact that a person was appointed on contract basis pursuant to the application for compassionate appointment would not make his appointment to be one under …

UP State Road Transport Corporation vs Brijesh Kumar 2024 INSC 638 – Compassionate Appointment – Contractual Appointment – Service Law Read More »

Mhabemo Ovung vss M Moanungba 2024 INSC 641 – Service Law

Service Law– Final seniority list of Junior Engineers set aside by High Court – Allowing appeal, SC upheld the list and observed: The blatant error committed by the Division Bench of the High Court is that upgraded Sectional Officer, Grade-I, are directed to be given seniority in the cadre of Junior Engineers from a date …

Mhabemo Ovung vss M Moanungba 2024 INSC 641 – Service Law Read More »

Ushaben Joshi vs Union Of India 2024 INSC 624 – Service Law

Summary: Central Administrative Tribunal, Ahmedabad rejected application preferred by the appellant with a prayer that the respondents be directed to regularise her services in the Group ā€˜Dā€™ post – High Court upheld this order – Allowing appeal, SC observed: Keeping in view the fact that an employee similarly placed but inducted in service after nearly …

Ushaben Joshi vs Union Of India 2024 INSC 624 – Service Law Read More »

Indian Council Of Agricultural Research vs Rajinder Singh 2024 INSC 622 – Service Law

Service Law -In any institution incentives may be given to a particular category of employees to get higher qualifications during service, considering their job requirements. Merely because different set of employees, who may be working in aid but governed by different set of rules and having different duties to discharge also obtain that qualification, will …

Indian Council Of Agricultural Research vs Rajinder Singh 2024 INSC 622 – Service Law Read More »

Rajkaran Singh vs Union Of India 2024 INSC 621 – Service Law – Pensionary Benefits – Article 12 Constitution

Summary: Whether the appellants herein, despite being classified as temporary employees of a scheme managed by contributory pooling of funds, can claim entitlement to pensionary benefits in accordance with the 6th CPC? SC Held: The denial of pensionary benefits solely on the basis of their temporary status, without due consideration of these factors, appears to …

Rajkaran Singh vs Union Of India 2024 INSC 621 – Service Law – Pensionary Benefits – Article 12 Constitution Read More »

Maitreyee Chakraborty vs Tripura University 2024 INSC 616 – Service Law

University – University, being a statutory body, any such conduct would tantamount to an arbitrary and unreasonable exercise of power, apart from being unfair. The discretion vested in the Executive Council should be exercised in a fair and non- arbitrary manner. It cannot be based on the whim and caprice of the decision-making authority. If …

Maitreyee Chakraborty vs Tripura University 2024 INSC 616 – Service Law Read More »